![]() ![]() This is trying to establish Apple Spatial Computing to sit alongside Apple Desktop Computing, for the next 30 years starting. This isn't even trying to compete with Magic Leap or HoloLens 2. This isn't trying to compete with Quest 3, Pico 5, or PSVR2. For entertainment? 2D Apple Arcade games and AppleTV+. Its a VR/MR headset to get Apple devotees used to Spatial Computing. This is an intriguing device that cannot do True AR in an enterprise setting. And how many people buy a $3500 MacBookPro? a million or two a year. ![]() The price, the featureset, the functionality, this is like selling laptops to people all over again. This is like a laptop from literally 30 years ago. The Vision Pro has a two hour battery life. Then look at sales of top tier Mac Book Pros. So compare a Vision Pro as a Mac for your face, a facial computer to a MacBook Pro as a mac for your lap (a lap-top) and that works quite well. NOTHING that Apple has made works with comparison to this the price point except Mac Computers. The Newton was the precursor to the iPad in price and functionality. ![]() The Apple Newton was $900 at launch in 1993. The Magic Leap was $2300 for the ML1 and $3300 for the ML2. The Apple Vison Pro cannot be compared to an iPhone unless the comparer is going to price subsidize every consumer at a rate of $1800 per consumer. iPhones have gotten slightly more expensive even adjusted for inflation. The iPhone 14 Pro in 2022 was $999 for the base model with $1099 and $1299 for increases in memory storage. People keep comparing the Apple Vision Pro to the iPhone. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |